Destructive Journalism vs Responsible Reporting

0
390
.Image credit to GFoRD group Admin Alexander Nilo. – apocea.org

Destructive Journalism vs Responsible Reporting. Please Save the image then post it on your social media account/pages/groups to make it viral

Watch the Video Pres-con ni Pres. Duterte ” Spread and Share”
Practical answer: Ang katotohanan at ang ilang corrupt/bayarang Media! – truth hurts

PRESIDENT DUTERTE TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT AGAIN –

EPISODE # 1.
President Duterte is going to be the biggest victim of bad journalism, I rest my case.
Instead of writing articles and using media platforms which will unite the Nation, cheap writers choose this specific topic which was taken out of context. Watch the video and find the word or thought that “Endorses Media / Journalist Killing” or him “Condoning Media / Journalist Killing”… He stated what and how things are happening now.

Because not many listen and comprehend full videos now a days, I have cut the clip regarding twisted headlines being published today by the Mainstream Media today. I refuse to believe headlines and articles anymore.

Today is just a classic case of people believing hearsay & scrolling through headlines, as usual. With the attention span of people, I’m not surprised how it’s been handled.
Isa lang masasabi ko… keep discussing about it until the standard of journalism get’s better. And if you know someone who accepts bribes for articles, expose them.

He’s not the media’s favorite I can see why, his broken statements seem to give them a hard time to write any “juicy” story, so they make stuff up instead. So at this point, the people themselves need to dissect further.

My UP Diliman professors were right, a lot of the problems stem from journalists who write notes too fast just to write the story rather than LISTENING before writing – and of course, there are people who read sensationalized articles and react like as if they were proven right..

NEVER BELIEVE HEARSAY, always listen to FULL STATEMENTS.
The discussion was a very specific case (JUN PALA), and the example cited was very specific to why these killings happen today, a practice that has to be controlled by the Duterte Administration. It was never ENDORSED or CONDONED.

Where in the video do you hear that he condones such an action? But he cites that it’s a reality TODAY and WHY it happened to certain journalists. It’s called premise, my friends.

It’s a DISCUSSION ABOUT A SPECIFIC TOPIC, not a GENERAL action he has and will condone(s). What a circus.

In case you don’t know who Jun Pala is, eto..
Jun Pala Case: http://archives.newsbreak-knowledge.ph/…/the-jun-pala-dile…/

 

UPDATE PRESCON NO.2  JULY 02, 2016

Comments

comments

LEAVE A REPLY